Brilliant Earth claims that using recycled gold helps the environment and reduces mining. The illustration shows how recycled gold is refined dirty gold merely rebranded as eco-friendly. This article explains why this greenwashing undermines global initiatives, such as Fairtrade Gold, that support impoverished and exploited small-scale gold miners (and help the environment!)
Author's note: I have been a jeweler for 25 years, a pioneer in ethical sourcing, an anti-mining activist, and writer for trade and consumer magazines on ethical jewelry issues. This Brilliant Earth Review, originally published in October 2018, will continually be updated. It's one chapter of my 45,000 word Ethical Jewelry Exposé: Lies, Damn Lies and Conflict Free Diamonds.
If you want to be part of the solution, and NOT support the jewelry industrial complex—which has funded wars that have killed millions of people, and commited countless ecological attrocities—this Brilliant Earth review is for you.
This Brilliant Earth review is essential because nearly every blogger, reporter, or potential customer looking to learn about or purchase ethical jewelry, diamonds encounters the Brilliant Earth behemoth. Brilliant Earth, far more than any other company, dominates the internet for any topic related to ethics + jewelry and/or diamonds.
Their website gets over a million visits a month, their social media presence is massive—and, they have even opened up eight retail stores in major markets across the US. They have generated endless positive publicity from trade and mainstream press. They even dominate Google searches for "Brilliant Earth Reviews."
Their story of social and ecological engagement is designed to capture any consumer who wants to make a difference. As the self proclaimed "Global Leader" in ethical jewelry, they are so successful that the ethical jewelry movement in North America is, as they have claimed on their website for years, their movement.
Screenshot taken summer 2018. For years Brilliant Earth has claimed that the ethical jewelry movement is their own, inviting us to "join the movement."
Millennials, Gen Z, or anyone looking for an ethically sourced wedding ring will most likely think, I can trust them and move on to the myriad other tasks to get done before my wedding.
But should they be trusted?
This Review vs Other Brilliant Earth Reviews
Unlike other Brilliant Earth reviews, this review is not about customer service, quality of workmanship, or how many five star ratings a $XXX wedding ring with a lab grown diamond gets. You can get that info easily elsewhere.
The important question—the question primarily addressed in this Brilliant Earth review—is, are the claims of exemplary ethics a scam, fake, fraud, legit, or reputable?
To get the answer, this Brilliant Earth review is divided into four parts: a brief introduction to provide you with critical information about what ethical jewelry is, followed by a review of Brillaint Earth's recycled gold, their "fair trade" marketing, and diamonds.
Here's the bottom line:
If you are considering a purchase from Brilliant Earth, I urge you to read this review in full.
You will be rewarded with an insiders' understanding of the current ethical jewelry zeitgeist not available anywhere else. You'll understand a lot more about Brilliant Earth's sourcing, and also claims behind so-called "responsible jewelry" that will help you make an informed purchase.
Apart fom that, a wedding ring is a beautiful symbol of your love and commitment. It's a piece of jewelry you plan to wear for the the rest of your life.
If you care enough to seek out a company that claims alignment between sourcing and symbolism, spend a few minutes top find out whether those claims are accurate.
Part 1: A Review of Brilliant Earth's Beginnings
Eric Grossberg, co-Founder of Brilliant Earth. Photo (cropped here from the original photo in the interview) provided by Grossberg.
Back in 2007 I started FairJewelry.org, the very first blog/trade watchdog covering jewelry sourcing issues. It later evolved into Fair Jewelry Action, a human rights and environmental justice platform.
I had met Grossberg at events and had actually consulted with him pro bono on ethical sourcing issues. This led to one of the very first interviews on my blog, where he stated:
“Right now is a real opportunity for us to pro-actively redefine our relationship with the communities from which we source the materials in our products. This should extend beyond whitewashing and doing the minimum to satisfy critical NGOs.”
To “redefine our relationship” with producer communities is and remains the central issue.
As explain in this article I wrote in this feature article for Canada's top jewelry trade magazine, any legit claim around "ethical jewelry" should be measured against how it impacts improving the lives of people in the global south digging in the dirt with shovels.
Over one hundred million small-scale miners produce about 20% of the world’s gold and diamonds. Their lives are typically characterized by extreme poverty, ecocide, and exploitation.
These communities need our market support to create regenerative local economy. That's the opportunity real Grossberg is talking about in the quote above!
We need to address structural issues. As MLK said, "True compassion is more than flinging coins to the beggar; it comes to seeing that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring."
In fact, the ethical jewelry movement in the US was birthed because NGOs exposed the plight of the small-scale miner—which certainly resulted in the 2006 release of the film Blood Diamond. Blood diamonds purchased from small-scale diamond miners funded wars in the ‘80s and ‘90s that killed 3.7 million people.
At that time, in 2006, I was showing our jewelry in the Designer section of JCK in Vegas, North America’s premier wholesale event. I personally pioneered ethical sourcing in North America. Advocating for fair trade practices back then, buyers looked at me as if I were a lunitic.
[Read how jewelers considered themselves victims of NGOs and Hollywood for exposing these diamond-funded killings in Birth of the Ethical Jewelry Movement.]
These days, fourteen years later, ethical jewelry has become the hot trend in the jewelry marketing. Every jeweler is, to some degree or another, branding themselves as “responsible” or “ethical.”
To a large degree, this change is because of Brilliant Earth.
Let’s now explore what progress Grossberg has taken advantage of, to use his words, the, "opportunity for us to pro-actively redefine our relationship with the communities..." starting by looking at gold.
Part 2: The Small Scale Gold Supply Chain: A Situation Briefing
Take a look at this video I shot in Tanzania a few years ago:
This miner is hand-mixing mercury, gold dust, and water. Small-scale mining is the greatest contributor of global mercury contamination. He will end up with a small nugget looking like this—a gold and mercury amalgam:
Gold fused with mercury after the panning shown in the video above. I took this photo.
He will take the mercury and gold amalgam and cook it in his frying pan before dinner, poisoning himself and his environment with methyl mercury, one of the most dangerous neurotoxins known to man.
This process destroys the ecology of entire regions, and the effects will last for hundreds of years.
He will later sell this gold for about 70% under market value. That’s barely enough to live on, so he remains stuck in a cycle of poverty.
[To understand a bit more about the seriousness of these issues, here are two NY Times articles: mercury used in gold mining in Indonesia and the Amazon.]
These are the people who supply 20% of the world’s gold supply chain while making up 90% of the world’s gold mining labor. They mine to survive, but they need support and access to international markets to mine gold safely.
The good news is, we can help! There are now systems in place that would allow us to create a whole new market. In fact, in the UK, Fairtrade Gold was recognized as a major market trend back in 2017. There are over 250 Fairtrade gold jewelers in the UK alone. The focus on the ethical consumer in that country is based on supporting small-scale producers.
Let’s now, in our Brilliant Earth review, consider the initiative in context to this new opportunity to provide the most transformative and ethical gold in the world: Fairtrade/Fairmined Gold.
A Review of Brilliant Earth's Gold Sourcing
Fairmined/Fairtrade Gold was introduced to the UK in 2011, though the standards split in 2013. These days we have Fairtrade Gold and Fairmined Gold.
[To learn more about the split and the history of Fairmined/Fairtrade Gold in the US, read this.]
Though Fairmined and Fairtrade Gold are different brands with different politics, what’s critical to understand at this point is that both would help the guy above extract gold safely, removing mercury from the environment while uplifting the miner from desperate poverty.
Also, both Fairtrade Gold and Fairmined Gold have failed to have any significant market impact in the US.
[Full disclosure: since 2015, there has been only one Fairtrade Gold jeweler in the US: me. Learn more about Fairtrade Gold here.]
Brilliant Earth, the “leading ethical jewelers,” jumped on the Fairmined Gold initiative in 2013 and endorsed it strongly.
Note this screenshot from Mining in Latin America: Critical Approaches to the New Extraction, which elaborates on Brilliant Earth’s strong commitment to the Fairmined Gold movement:
And here, another screenshot of the Fairmined Gold mines Brilliant Earth sources from:
Note above the URL on this page: It isn’t “/Fairmined-gold.” It’s /fair-trade-gold, which is a much stronger keyword even though Brilliant Earth does not sell Fairtrade Gold. Screenshot from summer 2018.
This below statement about making a positive difference through Fairmined Gold remains on their website at the time of this updated article, November 2019:
The problem is, Brilliant Earth is marketing Fairmined Gold even though they phased it out by 2018.
Part 3: Reviewing Brilliant Earth's Fairmined Gold Marketing
This screenshot, taken spring of 2018, shows the full extent of Brilliant Earth’s Fairmined Gold product listings:
By June of 2018, only one of the items pictured above—the ring on the far left—was actually still for sale. As of December 2019, it no longer is.
We inquired to Brilliant Earth about the necklace above and got this email back:
“I spoke to my team about our fair minded (sic) gold collection and it was just a temporary promotion we did…. Our fair-mined collection was for a limited time in limited styles. Both Fairmined and recycled are very ethical supply chains. We like working with recycled metals because then there is no new mining that takes place and then we are not causing any more environmental degradation.”
So…in Brilliant Earth’s own words, their commitment to Fairmined Gold—one of the most transformative powers in uplifting small-scale miners from poverty—was “just a temporary promotion.”
Here’s what’s key:
Once someone lands on one of Brilliant Earth’s Fairmined Gold pages, they are led to recycled gold. A Brilliant Earth customer representative says, “both Fairmined and recycled gold are very ethical supply chains.”
However, they are far from equal.
Creating a market that has the potential to uplifts millions of small-scale gold miners...is not the same as purchasing recycled gold from one of dozens of refining companies that received its gold originally from a mine which in all likelihood was massively destructive to the environment.
Here's a key point in my Brilliant Earth Review:
Essentially, Brilliant Earth is using the Fairmined Gold keywords and massive search collateral to drive people to their website in order to promote their recycled gold product.
Let me get to the essence and break down what’s going on here:
I can purchase a gold ring with gold from the most toxic source in the world. Then, if it doesn’t sell, I can melt it down and turn it into an “eco-friendly” recycled gold ring that I can market as helping to save the planet—and the ill-informed consumer will believe me!
This illustration below shows the true nature of the "eco-friendly" recycled gold scam:
Brilliant Earth stretches incredulity event further with its advocacy for recycled gold as a deterrent to mining, as shown in this screenshot from their website in June 2018:
Recycled products have a great consumer perception. Recycled paper reduces cutting down trees. Recycled aluminum means less aluminum demand for beer cans. All of this is true.
But, gold is a currency hedge!
Large-scale mines will continue to destroy the environment with massive industrial holes in the earth as long as they can make money doing so. This is about greed. I oppose large-scale god mining and have led campaigns against it in my community.
Small-scale mining is different. It will continue as long as the miners need to feed themselves and their families.
Here's my key point:
There is no evidence anywhere that choosing recycled or vintage gold has any impact on global demand newly mined gold.
[To explore this issue further, read my piece Fairtrade Gold vs. Recycled Gold.]
It would be one thing if Brilliant Earth merely advocated for recycled metals and left Fairtrade and Fairmined initiatives alone, but that's not the case.
Review of Brilliant Earth's Marketing of Fair Trade and Fairmined Gold.
Even though Brilliant Earth has not sold Fairmined jewelry for a while, they continue to market it as this screen shot from November 2019 shows:
Though Fairmined Gold has not gotten any market traction in the US, there are still a few small jewelry studios who use it.
But because of Brilliant Earth’s dominance on Google, those looking for Fairmined Gold will land on highly ranked Brilliant Earth pages. From there, they will be encouraged to buy recycled gold (which their customer service reps explain is essentially equal in ethics to Fairmined gold.)
This practice not only enhances Brilliant Earth’s business, but it also creates market confusion, undermining smaller studios who have tried to make a real difference for producer communities
But here’s the kicker: what Brilliant Earth does is even worse than using Fairmined clickbait.
Brilliant Earth’s marketing, its powerful emphasis on recycled metals, also impacts a viable Fairtrade Gold movement.
Review of Brilliant Earth's Fair Trade Gold and Fair Trade Jewelry Claims
Fairtrade Gold is perhaps the most powerful transformative product in the jewelry world today. It is popular in several EU countries.
Recycled gold as an ethical proposition would never be taken seriously in the UK, where Fairtrade Gold is the market choice. As I mentioned above, there are over 250 Fairtrade Gold jewelers.
In the US as well, those looking for exceptional ethical jewelry might well search for the keyword “fair trade + gold."
But before we go further, let’s start by defining fair trade as “a social movement whose stated goal is to help producers in developing countries achieve better trading conditions.”
“Fairtrade” and “fair trade” are not the same thing.
In brief: the term “Fairtrade Gold” is trademarked by FLO/Fairtrade International. The Fairtrade logo is one of the most powerful global brands:
You’ve probably seen this logo (without the “Gold”) on chocolate, coffee and other agricultural products. As the only Fairtrade Gold jeweler in the US since April, 2015, I am the only US jeweler who can use this logo.
“Fair trade” is a general term that can be used by anyone, in any context. This makes it a magnet for false claims, akin to the words “all-natural,” which food conglomerates spin at every opportunity.
[For more on the differences between “Fairtrade Gold” and “fair trade gold,” click here.]
The point is this:
The general consumer in the US looking for a wedding ring does not understand the difference between "Fairtrade" and "fair trade".
Let’s take a review of how Brilliant Earth markets “fair trade" with this Google screenshot:
Screenshot from summer 2018.
Another example: the screenshot below implies in its title: "fair trade gold- Brilliant Earth" that they sell fair trade gold.
Screenshot from November 2019.
Additionally, these two screenshots below state that “Brilliant Earth promotes the development of a fair trade gold system” as part of “Our Movement.”
The first screen shot is from August 2018, and the second was taken in November 2019.
Essentially, there is no such thing as this “fair trade gold system.” To make this claim confuses the market narrative and undermines the real Fairtrade Gold system.
Again, my point is this: Brilliant Earth takes advantage of public ignorance on the difference between “Fairtrade Gold”—which a trademarked term audited by FLOCert, and “fair trade gold”—which has no real universally accepted standards and principles.
This misinformation ends up spreading into most authoritative sources.
This Wikipedia article seen in a November 2019 Google search states that Brilliant Earth has committed itself to using “fair-trade-certified gold”:
Again, I just want to emphasize that these claims are very, very damaging for the Fairtrade Gold movement—which is trying to help the guy mixing his hands in mercury water.
I could end my article here, and leave you to judge for your self whether, in consideration of this Brilliant Earth review, this company is indeed a fake, fraud, reputable, or legitimate.
But we still have not arrived to the brilliant and lucrative center of a nefarious coherence.
Part 4: Review of Brilliant Earth's Marketing Strategy
Let us go back to the beginning, when co-Founder Eric Grossberg mentioned in his quote that he wanted to go “beyond whitewashing and doing the minimum to satisfy critical NGOs.”
What I will show you here, is how Brilliant Earth works to have his cake and eat it too.
Brilliant Earth wants to align itself with both well-respected NGOs and the Responsible Jewellery Council, even while these very NGOs denouce the Council's standards.
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) have acted as key watchdogs for the jewelry sector. From Global Witness’ first exposure of the Blood Diamond wars in 1998, to Earthworks’ important No Dirty Gold Campaign in 2004, to the more recent work of Human Rights Watch’s “Beyond the Bling” in 2018, and many others.
Brilliant Earth has long marketed their relationship with NGOs to boost their credibility—such as in this article referencing Amnesty International.
These articles are mainly critical of a wide variety of social and ecological justice issues regarding the sourcing from the mainstream jewelry sector.
And, the organization that best represents the “responsible” methods of the mainstream is the Responsible Jewellery Council (Council), a nonprofit founded by fourteen companies in 2004. Among those fourteen are De Beers Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton, Cartier, Newmont Mining, Signet Group, Tiffany & Co, Zales Corp, and Jewelers of America. Today, the Council has over 1100 members and represent hundreds of billions of dollars of retail and mining interests.
It is the Council which has created a set of “responsible” standards which are currently being widely adopted across the industry based upon “chain of custody protocols.”
[For a more extensive introduction to the Responsible Jewellery Council, read this. Further, here, I show how this “nonprofit” Council is really a trade association. And, if you really want to dig in, this piece I provide evidence that their standards are weak and ineffective.]
As shown in the screenshot below, taken in August, 2018, Brilliant Earth endorses the Council’s protocols:
Now, stay with me.
Understanding these matters is a little bit like opening Russian dolls. You think you have arrived in the center, but that’s merely on more layer that covers up what is in the actual core.
So, let me connect some dots as to why this endorsement is significant.
Earthworks, the NGO that started the No Dirty Gold Campaign back in 2004, published a brutal and substantive critique of the Responsible Jewellery Council’s credibility in their 2013 white paper: More Shine Than Substance
To quote from the executive summary:
“The Responsible Jewellery Council system and its components are riddled with flaws and loopholes… rendering it an ineffective tool by which to create an environmentally and socially responsible supply chain in the jewelry industry.”
Yet Brilliant Earth uses the credibility of Earthworks to promote their ethical stance, particularly their commitment to Earthworks’ powerful No Dirty Gold campaign.
A Google search containing Brilliant Earth and No Dirty Gold will yield numerous articles. Additionally, here is a screenshot from Earthwork’s website, from November 2019:
This screenshot below shows Brilliant Earth referencing a Human Rights Watch article. The article on blood diamonds and violence in Africa, based upon information from Human Rights Watch, shows to the average person that Brilliant Earth considers this NGO an important watchdog for the jewelry sector.
Screenshot from November 2019.
Yet…in context to the Responsible Jewellery Council’s “responsible” standards, the 2018 Human Rights Watch report, The Hidden Cost of Jewelry, wrote,
“The Responsible Jewellery Council promotes standards that allow companies to be certified even when they fail to support basic human rights… (it) is essentially an industry body. Its decision-making bodies do not include consumer groups, representatives of mining communities (for example, organizations addressing land rights or environmental harms), trade unions or miners’ associations, or human rights nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).”
Moreover, Human Rights Watch’s anti-Responsible Jewellery Council call to action was signed by these 29 NGOs:
Amnesty International, Anti-Corruption Trust of Southern Africa, ask! Arbeitsgruppe Schweiz Kolumbien (Swiss Working Group on Colombia), Artisanal Gold Council (Canada), Centre for Natural Resource Governance (Zimbabwe), Child Labor Coalition (US), Coalition de la Société Civile de la Région de Grands Lacs contre l'exploitation illégale des Ressources Naturelles (African Great Lakes Region), Ecumenical Institute for Labor Education and Research (Philippines), Enough Project (US), Gesellschaft für bedrohte Völker (Society for Threatened Peoples STP, Switzerland), Global March Against Child Labor, Global Witness,Groupe d'Appui aux Exploitants des Ressources Naturelles (Democratic Republic of Congo), Groupe de Recherche et de Plaidoyer sur les Industries Extractives (Côte d’Ivoire), Human Rights Watch, India Committee of the Netherlands (Netherlands), IMPACT (Canada), IndustriALL Global Union, International Corporate Accountability Roundtable, International Labor Rights Forum, MIHOSO International (Ghana), National Consumers League (US), New Light Children Centre Organization (Tanzania), Public Eye (Switzerland), Réseau de Lutte Contre La Faim (Cameroon), Solidarity Organisation Afrikagrupperna (The Africa Groups of Sweden), Stop Child Labour Coalition (Netherlands), Swedwatch (Sweden), Zimbabwe Environmental Law Association (Zimbabwe).
Let me give you one more example of Brilliant Earth referencing their concern and support of NGOs—this time, in context to diamonds.
In 2011, Global Witness, the organization that uncovered the blood diamond atrocities, resigned from the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme, which ostensibly works to prevent conflict diamonds from entering the market.
The issue was over Zimbabwe diamonds. Essentially, blood diamonds from Zimbabwe were being certified by the Kimberley Process as Conflict Free.
Brilliant Earth references Global Witness numerous times in articles, but here are a few examples spotted in November 2019:
Note the text at the bottom: "Brilliant Earth and non-profits like Global Witness in highlighting….” This is a kind of co-branding. We’re led to believe that that Brilliant Earth is strongly aligned with champions of human rights.
Yet, the Responsible Jewellery Council endorsed blood diamonds coming from Zimbabwe as Kimberley-certified “conflict free" back in 2009. This was the event that many industry insiders considered fatal to the Kimberley Process.
At that time, Global Witness dropped out of the Kimberley Process, stating that its decision to accept Zimbabwe diamonds had “turned an international conflict prevention mechanism into a cynical corporate accreditation scheme.”
[The Kimberley process is the basis of “conflict free diamonds” claims. To learn more about these issues, read this article from my Exposé on how the Kimberley Process fell apart.]
Any Brilliant Earth review should consider that they endorse the Responsible Jewellery Council's standards. Therefore, they also align with the Council’s endorsement of the validity of the Kimberley Process—which has widely been denounced as ineffective.
The Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) and Brilliant Earth: A Review
The endorsement of the Responsible Jewellery Council by Brilliant Earth has one more component that is even more heinous.
In 2012, the Council published this declaration:
The Council essentially bypasses any historical atrocity, whether it be the diamond wars that killed 3.7 million people when De Beer’s controlled almost all the diamond trade, or more recent acts.
There’s no way of knowing how many of those diamonds from that time still sit in shoe boxes in De Beer’s London offices.
But it isn’t just diamonds that are absolved from past sins. Follow the links to these companies: Anglo Gold, BHP Billiton, Newmont, Rio Tinto; all now producing certified “responsible” gold under the Responsible Jewellery Council’s code.
Here’s the key point, once again...
Brilliant Earth states on their website, “Our chain of custody protocols were designed to be in alignment with…the Responsible Jewellery Council.”
Any Brilliant Earth review must take into account that they support and endorse a standard allows that large mining and retail interests—the Responsible Jewellery Council—to deny their previous atrocities.
This standard, according to the NGO’s that Brilliant Earth like to reference in their articles to show how much they care, “fails to support basic human rights” and even supports a system that allows blood diamonds from Zimbabwe to be called “conflict free.”
This is all part of a brilliant strategy.
Support of the Responsible Jewellery Council means that you gain support of the trade and the trade press. This garners massive positive publicity.
Yet they also appear as a social justice darling that appeals to the ethically-minded consumer who cares about social and environmental justice and is willing to purchase from a company that upholds humanistic values.
This is a perfect razor’s edge to ride: they get a whole spectrum of support: mainstream press, trade press, progressive ethical jewelry/fashion blogger press.
All that’s left for you to do is Join the Movement!
Brilliant Earth Review Part 5: Diamonds: Jacob Worth, Bryan Clark, and the Brilliant Earth “Scam”
Again it would be sufficient, I think, to stop here in our Brilliant Earth review—but in truth we’d be incomplete without considering diamonds.
In 2017, Brilliant Earth was accused of selling diamonds, labeled as Canadian, that were not of Canadian origin. Jacob Worth’s Brilliant Earth accusations led many to consider, “Is Brilliant Earth a fraud?”
Worth’s viral YouTube video has since been taken down, but you can check out Bryan Clark’s excellent article on The Next Web as well as Philip DeFranco’s YouTube video commenting on the situation.
In the end, the diamond vendor who said on video that Brilliant Earth’s diamonds sold as Canadian was not in fact Canadian retracted their remarks. Brilliant Earth also attacked the author of the blog, Jacob Worth, by accusing him of acting out of self-interest.
But in a way, I consider (at least for this Brilliant Earth review) these issues to be important, but it's not the center point of this writing.
In context to diamonds, my focus here is far more foundational: Brilliant Earth’s “Beyond Conflict Free” claim.
Brilliant Earth’s Diamond Narrative: “Beyond Conflict Free”
To start, we pick up the continuity in Brilliant Earth’s fair trade narrative. See the screenshot below taken in August 2018.
Here’s what’s key:
Fair trade diamonds of any sort do not even exist!
We are led to believe that Brilliant Earth has an active, current, central role—the center of a stakeholder discussion for an emerging fair trade diamond.
Greg Valerio, the father of the Fairtrade Gold movement, who worked for Fairtrade International, confirmed in a 2018 conversation with Fairtrade International that Brilliant Earth is not in any kind of discussion with them over “fair trade” diamonds.
My understanding is that at this point, diamonds are not even on Fairtrade’s radar.
Yet Brilliant Earth continues to market the “fair trade” angle, this time in context to diamonds. Again, the term fair trade is used as clickbait in their Google ads:
Screenshot from spring 2018.
Further: on their website, Brilliant Earth claims that they are “working hard to increase access to diamonds that are mined in alignment with fair trade principles...”
Screenshot from spring 2018.
Yet Brilliant Earth’s sourcing of diamonds is from multinational corporations, including those based in Russia:
Screenshot from Brilliant Earth’s website showing diamond sourcing at the Alrosa mine in Russia.
Alrosa was recently referenced in this New York Times article in context to corruption allegations and Brexit.
The Russian government has a significant share in Alrosa. The largest buyer of this rough material has been Lev Leviev, notorious for his human rights abuses in Angola.
To link the activity of large multinational diamond mining corporations with fair trade principles is a bit of a stretch, I think.
Brilliant Earth sources its diamonds from other Responsible Jewellery Council members, such as Rio Tinto (Canada) and De Beers (Botswana and Namibia), though I saw no reference on their website saying that De Beers is a source.
Brilliant Earth does help fund the Diamond Development Initiative, which is their vision of a fair trade diamond future:
Screenshot from August, 2018.
The Diamond Development Initiative, however, is a non-profit in collaboration with De Beers, who will be purchasing all the diamonds and thereby controlling the market and messaging of any of these so called “fair trade” diamonds.
Putting De Beers in charge of a Fair Trade Diamond initiative that originally aspired to be run by Fairtrade International, back in 2008, is like putting David Duke as head of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
[For more on this, read my piece, Death of the Fair Trade Diamond.]
Reviewing Brilliant Earth's "Beyond Conflict Free" Diamonds: Better Than Your Average Conflict Free Diamond?
Because the Kimberley Process, which certifies diamonds as conflict free, is essentially broken, Brilliant Earth and ethical jewelers have to create new narratives in order to show that they are watching out for concerned consumers.
[I outline how jewelers finesse and spin the conflict free diamond narrative in detail here.]
Brilliant Earth has created a “Beyond” notion of “conflict free.”
Screenshot from summer 2018.
I’m not going to detail my personal abhorrence of the conflict free narrative. I’ll give you the quick version:
Kill 3.7 million Africans and then invent a “conflict free” narrative without truth, reconciliation, or restitution, to cover up the crimes. To me, “conflict free diamonds” = black African lives don’t matter. That’s why I am the only jeweler in the world, as far as I know, who argues, Boycott Conflict Free Diamonds.
To say you are “beyond” conflict free reminds me of the Hannah Arendt term “banality of evil.” “Beyond” conflict free diamonds doubly affirms that narrative to those people who would be most concerned about social justice.
It confirms De Beers’ strategy, as outlined in this 2000 New York Times article, of making “conflict free diamonds” into a virtue.
What’s Your Brilliant Earth Review?
Since my initial involvement in ethical Jewelry sourcing—as a jeweler named “The Best of the Best” in 2019, a writer on these issues for major trade magazines and other conscious consumer publications, I have watched a movement grow from nothing to the most important market trend.
It would seem, from the popularity of ethical jewelry sourcing and Brilliant Earth, that the world has changed. Certainly, you might get that from other Brilliant Earth reviews!
But, instead of creating an ethical jewelry movement in North America that would focus on small-scale producers who most need support to create regenerative local economic models…
Instead of basing participation in such a movement from large multinational mining companies on truth, reconciliation, and restitution to the communities impacted…
What we have are forward facing narratives that hide crimes in plain sight, by companies that want to capture this new market through specious narratives with a supply chain that draws minimally, in context to gold and diamonds, from exploited small scale miners.
High-profile charity initiatives can easily become a way of masking a new version of an old colonial story:
So, based upon what I’ve written here, how would you review Brilliant Earth now? Is criticism of Brilliant Earth valid?
Please do leave a comment. Even a short one will help this information get out to more people.
Continue on The Center of the Ethical Jewelry Exposé: Jewelry, Neocolonialism, and Strange Fruit
Return to the Seventh Russian Doll: Lies, Damn Lies, and Conflict Free Diamonds
Return to the Ethical Jewelry Exposé Landing Page
**All writing and images are open source, under Creative Commons 3.0. Any reproduction of this material must back link to the landing page, here. For high resolution images for publication, contact us at expose(AT)reflectivejewelry.com.**